Pages

Friday, January 6, 2017

John the Baptist and Radical Humility



Prophets and Baptisms, Pharisees and Sadducees; our gospel story for today is chock full of a dizzying array of terms and events.  Indeed, the more you look at this text the more confusing it seems to become.  While the story of John the Baptist has become so well read and so well loved by Christians that we may no longer notice it, the reality is Matthew is describing some genuinely strange things.  Why is this man John wandering the Judean wilderness, putting his life in danger from both the elements and robbers?  Why is he baptizing people in the Jordan River?  Religious immersion was hardly foreign for the Jews, but usually they did that in baths.  Why drag everybody out into the desert for something everybody could do at home?  And then the Pharisees get added to the mix.  Why are the Pharisees heading way out into the wilderness chasing after this man?  And why would they think that being a child of Abraham would exempt them from repentance?  It doesn’t make a lot of sense.  I mean, last time I checked the children of Abraham literally wrote the book on their screw ups so if somebody was holding a repentance tent revival out in the desert you would think they would be first in line.  And then there’s the matter of Prophecy, we are Christians seeing the fulfillment of Isaiah in this, and is some guy shouting in the wilderness really that tremendous of a prediction?  Indeed, Matthew has been well critiqued over the years for his use of the Hebrew
Scriptures and the fulfillment of his people’s prophecy, wrongfully so in my opinion.
But how do we make sense of it all?  How do we make sense of all the strange and wonderful things going on in our text today?  We can do what Christians normally do, what the Church as a whole has gotten in the habit of doing.  We can gloss over the text, ignoring all the questions and it’s strangeness. We can just talk about the need to repent because that’s the word that appears twice.  It’s nice, it’s safe.  It’s shallow, but I guess it’ll do.  But the reality while we might emerge with a nice, very forgettable lesson, it wouldn’t be all that helpful to other people would it?  Indeed, when those outside the church look at what we do with our Scriptures, when they see us ignore the questions and be content with a shallow gospel, it doesn’t paint a very pretty picture of Christianity does it?  It reinforces the image that a Christian is no different than any other religious person, someone who seeks to solve life’s anxieties by mere obedience to any old book.  When they see us unwilling to ask good questions, unwilling to prod too deep for fear we might at last pierce the illusion, well that sends a message.  It tells people that yes we believe, but only so far.  Yes, we obey, but it is out convenience and familiarity that we do so, not out of knowledge and faith.  I have been with you for over a year now and I am proud to say that I don’t think you have ever settled to be that kind of Christian, and so I will not do you the injustice of preaching that kind of sermon.  

But how DO we make sense of it all? How do we honestly wrestle with what is going on here? Why did Matthew put this account into his story, and how might this message apply to us today?  In an America where Christianity has become almost irrelevant to people’s lives, these are all questions the Church can no longer afford to avoid.

While I would absolutely agree that repentance is indeed a substantial piece of our gospel lesson, the reality is it’s not the only piece, nor, I would argue is it the most important one.  Repentance is of course essential to the Christian Life, or indeed just moral living in general.  None of us gets it right the first time through, so repenting of one’s mistakes in this life is a given.  However, there is a deeper theme in our gospel lesson, one that is very easy to miss – not only because we are not first century Jews but also because that theme is an attribute that doesn’t really come naturally to most human beings.

Now to illustrate this theme, however, we have to switch gears a bit.  It’s going to be difficult to see without a more modern day example.  Before graduating Seminary, young pastors-to-be have to find a place to intern.  The Church I had found for that purpose was a very liberal UCC church in St. Louis Park.   As a student of an Evangelical Seminary raised in Lutheranism, I wouldn’t say I was exactly welcomed with open arms by everybody there.  Indeed, as I would find out rather quickly Liberal Christianity could be just as cold and self-righteous as any other; I think it took me two years to finally convince everyone I was in fact not some sort of right wing spy and saboteur.  After all that was said and done there, however, I did learn a very valuable lesson.  I learned the problem is never the politics; people on every side or no side of every philosophy, ism, or party can and do have valuable and respectful dialogues and even friendships.  No, the problem is never the ugly politics, it’s the ugly people. And while I could go on and on about my experiences there, there was one incident in particular that I think is most relevant to our gospel lesson.

As the seminary intern I was placed in charge of a program called Theology on Tap.  It was essentially a Bible Study at a bar, and to be honest it was actually a really wonderful experience.  Many people who go to drink the night away don’t do so because they that believe God loves them.  Indeed, many of the regulars there feel abandoned, that God somehow hates them and wants nothing to do with them.  Being able to bring the gospel into their midst, the good news of God’s love and acceptance was life changing for a lot of people, myself included.  One particular session, however, we managed to attract a student from United Theological Seminary, an institution for very, very liberal Christians.  And no, he wasn’t a regular there, he came because of the Theology not the Tap.

 Lots of people came to these meeting: Conservatives, progressives, agnostics, atheists, even a modern pagan or two.  Everybody was welcome there.  And at this particular meeting we had this soon to be ordained very Liberal young man from a very Liberal educational institution and a conservative evangelical marine.  And you know what they did?  They talked.  They respectfully conversed, asking questions making points, and they walked away loving each other.  Not only that, where God was in that moment was when I saw all the presuppositions of that young pastor-in-training completely melt away.  Everything that his professor’s taught him about the opposite side he saw fell terribly short.  He was ready for an unlistening monster, stubborn and arrogant, but what he got was loving and kindly thought.  I do believe God was in that moment for him as he realized that talking about the other side in fact was no substitute for talking to the other side.  It was a baptism of the spirit, what went in was afraid and confused, but what emerged was humble and at peace.  Humility, ladies and gentlemen, that is the deepest theme that is woven into our gospel story.

St. Matthew, Jesus’ disciple, was of course a Palestinian Jew, indeed a former tax collector according to the earliest traditions, and his gospel is to other Palestinian Jews.  Now, as an American, I don’t need to explain to anyone here what 9/11 is, I won’t confuse anywhere here when I say the words, “Just do it” or “Git ‘er dun.”  These things are very well known in our culture and they are understood implicitly.  The same is true for Matthew.  Matthew doesn’t need to explain to his fellow Jews why John the Baptist is out there, he doesn’t need to waste words explaining why Pharisees would follow him out into the middle of nowhere, they already know.  They’ve lived it.  You see, Baptism in the Jordan was a common practice in first century Judea – for gentiles.  Judaism had garnered the interest of many Gentiles in the first century, they were called God fearers or Theophilus, friends of God.  Well, as a Gentile you could also take this a step further and become a fully Jewish.  You could convert entirely to Judaism and be given all the rights and responsibilities of a native born Israelite.  As part of that process you were Baptidzomai,  immersed in the Jordan just like Naaman the Syrian from the book of Kings.  Just as Naaman went in as a leper, Just as he went in full of uncleanness but emerged on the banks of the river cleansed and believing in the power of the Jewish God, so would this new gentile convert.  But John’s isn’t baptizing gentiles, is he?
John the Baptist is very controversial in the first century.  Not only is he deliberately dressing like the prophet Elijah, not only is he wandering the desert and eating locusts and wild honey just like Elijah, but he is offering repentance, indeed offering atonement, reconciliation to God apart from Animal Sacrifice, Apart from Temple, Apart from Jewish Scripture.  Do you see why a legalistic Pharisee would chase this guy out into the middle of nowhere, now, why he’d say he didn’t need to be baptized because he was a child of Abraham?  Starting to make Sense?

Now to be clear, I don’t think John’s ministry was about being disobedient.  There is nothing written about him that says he taught to avoid the temple, not to sacrifice or observe holidays; neither do we possess anything that says he taught disobedience to Scripture.  John’s ministry was not about that.  John’s ministry was about radical humility, radical repentance and conviction of sin.  John’s message was abundantly clear, that if you as a Jew cannot come before your God publicly and shout that I am no better than the unclean people I look down on, then all the sacrifices, all the Temples and all Scripture verses you can muster are going to mean exactly diddly squat.  A jew going to the Jordan to be baptized by John is no different than a Nazi undergoing a Barmitzvah or a Klan Member being baptized in a black church.  It is a heart-wrenching admission of guilt and an act of brazen, selfless humility. 

Ladies and gentlemen, John the Baptist is not some idle curiosity within the Christian faith.  Of all the factions and ministries that existed from within the Judaism of that time, when God became Incarnate this is the one He backed.  Jesus was Baptized into this ministry, and indeed, without the message of John the Baptist Christianity would have been very, very different.  John’s ministry is as vibrant, relevant, and necessary as it was two thousand years ago.  If we are not right with God here in our hearts, that if we can’t walk with our God humbly, repenting of our pride then no amount of sacrament or correct theology is going to save us.  People come up and tell me, “Keven, I can’t find God, He is missing from my life.  I can’t feel him.”  Well, if God cannot be found where you are comfortable, than the only answer is you’ll to go where you are uncomfortable to find Him.  If God cannot be found in the city then the reality is He must be somewhere in the wilderness.  If you have not felt God, if you aren’t experiencing God, the answer is not to stay where you are, to keep comfortable and feel secure, but to find that voice calling in the desert and be humble enough to follow it before it’s too late.         

Christ is coming, ladies and gentlemen, both as the babe of Bethlehem and as the Conquering Hero of Creation, and we have been called to prepare the way of the Lord in our own lives, and to make straight the paths of crooked hearts.  Let us not be so prideful as to meet him with our work unfinished.  Amen.              

No comments:

Post a Comment